Continuous Improvement

Without a robust Continuous Improvement (CI) program you aren’t necessarily struggling, but you are:

Working harder than you need to
Absorbing costs you don’t have to
Carrying risk that grows quietly until there is suddenly a significant problem that can no longer be ignored.

Orchard develops CI programs that are appropriately scaled to your organization, genuinely useful, and built on the expertise of some of the most demanding, high-consequence sectors in the world.

We grow our CI programs from strong roots:

A reporting culture where problems and near-misses are exposed to the light rather than buried or ignored
Trending and analysis tools that reveal patterns across groups of individual events
Root-cause analysis that distinguishes symptoms from causes
Corrective and preventive action systems that nip the problem in the bud
Feedback mechanisms that tell you whether the fix actually worked
Documentation and knowledge management that preserves what was learned.

Continuous Improvement Services

Our Approach to Continuous Improvement

Orchard’s CI practice was shaped by deep experience in high-consequence sectors like healthcare, technology and Canadian nuclear energy. These industries operate some of the most rigorous continuous improvement programs in the world, where the consequences of repeated failure are unacceptable and the standard of care is correspondingly high.

That experience taught us a specific way of thinking about continuous improvement:

Report. Cluster. Trend. Prioritize. Root cause. Fix. Learn. Document. Do better.

Our approach draws on two principles from high-consequence environments that apply equally well to large, complex operations, mid-sized nonprofits or tiny professional services firms:

Defence in depth

No single barrier should be your only protection against an error or a risk. A healthy CI program builds layered controls — prevention, detection, correction — so that the failure of one layer doesn’t become a failure of everything. This approach is just as applicable to a policy gap in an accounting firm as it is to a safety system in a power plant.

Feed-forward and feedback controls

Feedback controls respond to what already happened — they’re reactive, and they’re necessary. Feed-forward controls anticipate what could happen — they’re preventive, and they’re what separates organizations that repeatedly fix the same problems from organizations that stop having them. Mature CI programs use both, and Orchard helps you build both.